On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 06:47:44PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Dear debian-ocamlers, > findlib 0.7 is out and we have had a lot of time to mumble about where > to put the damned shared objects.
:))) > I'm going to package findlib 0.7 ASAP and I really would like to know > where we like to put shared objects. I've already said my opinion [1] as > others of you, but none has come from the OCaml development team. > > If noone object I would go for the 'libexec' way. Well, are we speaking about the same thing ? It means, you will put all dll.so into /usr/lib/ocaml/shlibs and all non packaged dll.so into /usr/local/lib/ocaml/shlibs, (well or another name instead of shlibs), right ? I am ok with it, but am rather busy. We will keep the ocaml-ldconf tool around for the time being, isn't it ? Then i will try to do a new ocaml package this week which takes this into acount, and you can upload the findlib package then (and have it depend on the version of ocaml i will upload or later ?). In the meantime, would you volunteer to ask the caml-list and the caml team on this subject, and that we with them standardize on a common name (libexec, shlibs, whatever, maybe stub-shlibs would be the correct name), if not, i will try to do it. As for the standardize on using findlib for install, i think it is too early, if needed. I agree that everyone third installing third party libs should use findlib, but this is not something we can enforce, as for the packaged stuff, i think we should let the decision for upstream, but then, if you feel like patching all the lib packages and do NMu, then ok by me, just be damn sure you don't break things by it. Basically, i think we should have a scheme of things that will enable us to do a gradual transition, don't you agree ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
