On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 09:03:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 08:50:24AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 07:37:18AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > But, if the missing build depend is a true build depend, then the > > > package cannot be build without it, and the autobuilder will fail > > > to > > > build the package, and then the missing binary package on all the > > > supported arches will stop the package from entering testing. > > > > Only if there are already binaries for this architecture and a > > previuos > > version in the archives. > > Are you telling me that if i create a new package it will be entering > testing without having been built for all the supported architectures > ?
Maybe I'm wrong, but actually I think that yes. If you look at the update_excuses (for some reason I cannot check right now), there is an entry for packages which are out of date (in case there is already a package for an earlier version), but none if the binary is simply missing. -Ralf. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
