Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm afraid I haven't installed it yet. However, after reading what Xavier >> said about bugs in 3.05, I think I'm going to put it on hold until 3.06. >> It is too much broken. It is probably unfortunate to have it in Debian, >> but it is too late now. > > No, it is unstable, it will go into testing or even on users system, > only when all dependencies are solved, which will not happen anytime > soon, especially if we don't rebuild the libraries. > > Note also that they forgot to bump the .cmi magic number, so it will try > to build with current libraries, but segfault ...
Yes, too bad :( > > Anyway, i feel it is good that it is in debian now, so people can test > it, maybe i should have but it in experimental though, with the > hindsight i have now. Well, I hope they'll have a 3.06 ASAP, because Debian unstable means that the packaging my be unstable, not the app ;-) > BTW, what do you all think about my mail to Xavier about the version > numbering ? i feel 3.06 should be called 3.05.1, not 3.06. I totally agree with you on this. I interpreted Xavier's reply as a polite way to ask you to mind your own business ;) I don't know if you had the same feeling ;) Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
