> BTW, is it ok to have the .o man extensions, lintian complains a lot > about all those.
Yes, we were not too sure that man/mano was the right place and .o the right extension. But we saw that perl and tcl do strange things, for example tcl put some man pages in man/mann and other man pages in man/man3 with extension .3tcl ... Besides, we saw man/mano exists on some systems. The Linux Filesystem Hierachy Standard stops at man/man8. Do you have a better idea where to place our ocaml man pages, and with what extension ? (personnaly i like the .o idea, and it works well). > > The Out_of_memory is still strange, but i will ask more information > > in the caml-list tomorrow (how much ram, try to add the -v option to > > ocamldoc to get progress information by verbose mode). > > Well, in my guess, the most probable thing is that there may not be free > mem available on the alpha box or something such, even on my box, the > build process uses a lot of time in this shell script, so this may be > the problem, i don't know. It could be, since the man pages generator uses some string concatenation (with the ^ operator), but not that much. The -v flag would help to find out if the Out_of_memory comes in the generation part of before. > You can look at the build log by following : > > http://buildd.debian.org/bymaint.php?maint=Sven%20Luther%20%3Cluther%40debian.org%3E%20 > > and hitting the ocaml line and alpha column and following the link > there. Ok, thanks. Friendly, Maxence
