On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 03:39:48PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 02:41:15PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > If I were a serious maintainer, I would use pbuilder ;-) > > > > Thanks for saying i am not serious :))) > > > > But then, pbuilder needs maybe more bandwith, is that not so, which i > > don't have. > > BTW, I use an approach with pbuilder in combo with a local debian > mirror.
Well, but you need high bandwith to maintain the local debian mirror. > > More seriously, i am being rather busy with my phd thesis right now, so > > i have not that much time for debian work. I _will_ continue to devote > > time to the ocaml package, and plan to fix all the existing problems and > > do the uploads, but this means i may lag some with the other library > > packages, like lablgtk, so anyone should feel free to make an NMU for > > them if i don't respond quickly. > > Just to keep track of current problem and/or whishlist, is ok for you if > we submit bug against the ocaml package just to remember what we have to > do and what is already done? If there is a problem, please submit a bug report, with the proper priority. > I'm pretty sure that the ocaml package has still a few old bugs just > because we (all) forgot to fix them. Such as ? I am pretty sure that i closed all bugs that were submitted to the BTS, there may still be problems i missed, but like said, i lost part of my mail archive, and the wait for 3.05/3.06 dalayed some of the stuff, and as thus i missed some of the dh_ocamlld fixes you sent. But i don't believe there are many important (packaging) problems left, i think. Friendly, Sven Luther
