On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:59:06AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 10:03:10AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > Basically, it goes as follows : > > > > We test in dh_ocamlld if the directory list is empty or not. > > > > => if the directory list is not empty, then we keep everything as > > before. > > > > => if the directory list is empty, then we don't use a postrm, and > > change the postinst so that ocaml-ldconf -plibname-ocaml -R is called. > > > > What do you think of it. > > It's hacky, but is nice and do the expected job. > IMO we can go for it. > > Regarding changes of dh_ocamlld, I've looked at it and the change is > trivial, but I've to be sure that debhelper leave untocuhed the last > arguments (i.e. these that aren't understood as standard debhelper > option) in ARGV, can you confirm this, Denis?
Well, Denis does not sound convinced, but i am in discution with him about this. Should i, in the mean time, upload a package with the other fixes, or do we have hopes that a compromise will be attained RSN ? Mmm, i will upload a package which contains the fixed dh_ocamlld now, since it will stop new libraries to be broken. Friendly, Sven Luther
