On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 16:11:33 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 04:01:56PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > > I'll choose this one because I don't have to change upstream > > Makefile :) > > Obviously, Maxence, this thread is for you :-)) Hi, I was away from keyboard this week-end (weel, away from my adsl connection ;-). I like to keep this dependency because when i modifiy the configure.in file, the configure is rebuilt, ./configure is luanched and master.Makefile is automatically recreated when i do 'make'. A 'touch configure' is the good solution i think. -- Maence
