On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:18:56PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I don't like it. > > > > My idea is. > > > > When a new release is made, i re-upload the current ocaml as ocaml-<N>, > > providing ocaml. > > > > Once this one enters unstable, i upload an ocaml package with the > > version bumped ocaml version <N+1>, and we use this to build new > > libraries and packages. Old libraries and package work fine with the > > previous stuff. > > > > The only way this will work is to haev strong library dependencies. > > I don't like any of the ideas anyway because as you said .. > > > Maybe the whole scheme is not worth it, anyway, i will move the ocaml > > ... it is not worth it after all. > > > libdir all the same, for the other benefits, and to let this possibility > > open in the future. I will do it after ocaml 3.06 enters testing. > > The libdir change in order to add the cvs snapshot is OK, IMO.
Ok, i will do it as soon as ocaml 3.06 enters testing then. We can think about the rest later on. > BTW, I'd prefer ocaml-snap (or ocaml-snapshot) because some package > coming from cameleon is called ocamlcvs. Ok, we already have (had since the maintainer resigned) galeon-snapshot. Friendly, Sven Luther
