On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:19:11AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 09:53:39AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > I much prefer 3.06.1 as dependency, but this could also be 3.06+1 or > > 3.06a or some other scheme. I don't think it is really astute that we > > use 3.06-11 for this, altough if you all think it is best, i will do it. > > I like 3.06-11, this a change in the debian package, not in the upstream > version.
What i dislike with this is the -11, since there is no virtual dependency called -1, ... -10. I understand (and like) the logic of using a - separator, but the -11 makes sense now, but would seem silly when we have a -14 or something such package. Friendly, Sven Luther
