On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 07:48:01PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 07:23:57PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > >> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > >> >> I'm not worried about people playing with dpkg 'manually', cause this > >> >> kind of people is probably enough skilled to fix the problem; I was > >> >> worried about people automagically upgrading unstable boxes. > >> >> > >> >> My opinion now is we can go ahead with the libdir transition, now. > >> > > >> > Ok, plan is to do it this WE. > >> > >> With a new lablGTK also? ;-) > > > > Yes, sure, i will rebuild all my library packages, and rebuild a new > > lablgtk. I almost did a new lablgtk but thought i would wait for the new > > ocaml package instead. > > Nice.
:)) > > So it is ok with you to if i upload the new libdir moved ocaml, without > > dpkg being fixed ? > > I'll do with it. If it is ok for APT, noone's gonna notice so > it is fine. > > Just a reminder: > > Build-Depends: ocaml-3.06-1 > > Depends: ocaml-base-3.06-1 (or ocaml-3.06-1) Yes, altough there might be special exceptions. Friendly, Sven Luther
