On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 05:47:15PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> The versioning looks strange. I would have made it a new > >> upstream version, rather than a new debian version, like : > >> 1.2.5+20021031-1. > > > > Well, yes, but the patch was small, and i applied it on my existing > > debian tree, after checking that it modified no makefile or such. By > > using such a strange version, i had no need to reupload the upstream > > tarball, which i thought rather nice. > > > > Now, if you disagree i can redo an upload though. > > I didn't know it was a patch, I thought it was a complete release > snapshot. Or maybe you made it a patch?
Both the complete release and the patch was available on Jacque's web site. I downloaded both yesterday, but decided to upload first the fixed 1.2.5 version because it was late. Today, i thought i will first look at the patch, to see if any build-stuff was changed, and saw it was a smallish patch, which just added a few functions. So i applied it, and when editing the changelog, i was first tempted to call it simply 1.2.5-6, but remembered your mail, and changed it to the current 1.2.5-6+2002.10.31 Friendly, Sven Luther
