Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 06:16:29PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: >> Hello, >> >> First of all, Happy New Year! >> >> I'm sorry I'm very late in updating Cameleon with respect >> to the ocaml policy but I encountered a final problem: >> 2 of the cameleon packages provide a small library that >> it is not worth shipping outside of the package. > > I have the same problem with advi also. > > What package are they with ?
mlchat and ocaml-report. > One solution would be to provide them in a cameleon-common or soemthing > such, and still keep the nativecode/bytecode split. I don't like this. > Another solution would be to do as i plan to do for advi, that is modify > the policy so that such packages can be done in native code and in > custom built bytecode. (or not custom built bytecode, but in the advi > case at least i didn't easily manage to make them non-custom built). I like this. :-) >> Hence, it is not possible for me to make them Arch:all. >> I have to solutions: >> - shipping a native package and a byte package ; this >> solves the problem but the native package it not >> necesssary at all >> - making an exception for such packages because their >> are like libraries ship with some binaries, i.e. >> leaving them Arch: any. > > Or modify the policy to accomodate them ? :))) I like this :-) >> Any opinion? > > Hope this helps some. A lot. Thanks. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
