On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:23:17PM +0100, Maxence Guesdon wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:04:29 +0100 > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:59:40PM +0100, Maxence Guesdon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > depending on the ocaml source is really a loosy way of coding, i know > > > > sometime it cannot be helped, but let's try to avoid that as often as > > > > possible. > > > > > > The only parts of cameleon which depend on the ocaml source are epeire > > > (graphical debugger) and topcameleon (graphical toplevel). > > > > Ok, but what exactly do you need for this ? > > > > if you could isolate the needed part, i couldship not the full > > ocaml-source, but a cameleon-support package containing only the > > compiled files you need. > > For topcameleon, I need the following .cmo files : > $(OCAMLDIR)/utils/config.cmo
Ok, this one i was thinking of including anyway. > $(OCAMLDIR)/utils/clflags.cmo > > and the definition of the types in some modules of $(OCAMLDIR)/parsing/ > > For epeire, I need a lot of .cmo files and types from the compiler. In fact, > the > debugger subdirectory of cameleon/epeire/ if a modifed copy of the OCaml > debugger sources. The modifications may be merged back to the OCaml sources in > the future. When it is done, the definition of types in parsing/ (for example) > will still be needed to build epeire. Could i apply this modifications to the ocaml packae, or will it break a lot of things ? We still need the parsing types. > It also needs some .cmi files where some types are defined but I dont know > exactly which ones. It would be simpler to include all .cmi files from the > directories included with a -I flag at compile time, that is : > ( $(DOTDOT) is the OCaml sources directory ) > > -I $(DOTDOT)/utils -I $(DOTDOT)/parsing -I $(DOTDOT)/typing \ > -I $(DOTDOT)/bytecomp -I $(DOTDOT)/toplevel \ > -I $(DOTDOT)/otherlibs/unix -I $(DOTDOT)/otherlibs/dynlink I would be happier if we could isolate the needed .cmi. > The .cmo files needed by epeire (from cameleon/epeire/debugger/Makefile) : > ( $(DOTDOT) is the OCaml sources directory ) > > $(DOTDOT)/utils/misc.cmo $(DOTDOT)/utils/config.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/utils/tbl.cmo $(DOTDOT)/utils/clflags.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/utils/consistbl.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/parsing/longident.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/typing/ident.cmo $(DOTDOT)/typing/path.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/typing/types.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/typing/btype.cmo $(DOTDOT)/typing/primitive.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/typing/typedtree.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/typing/subst.cmo $(DOTDOT)/typing/predef.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/typing/datarepr.cmo $(DOTDOT)/typing/env.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/typing/oprint.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/typing/ctype.cmo $(DOTDOT)/typing/printtyp.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/typing/mtype.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/bytecomp/runtimedef.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/bytecomp/bytesections.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/bytecomp/dll.cmo $(DOTDOT)/bytecomp/symtable.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/bytecomp/opcodes.cmo $(DOTDOT)/bytecomp/meta.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/toplevel/genprintval.cmo \ > $(DOTDOT)/otherlibs/dynlink/dynlink.cmo These would not be needed if i merge the modifications, right ? So we only need Config, Clflags and the cmi in the above listing, and the modifications. Including the modifications in the ocaml package may not be recomendable or even possible though. > I don't know whether it's worth creating another package. Well, i could just include it in the ocaml package. Ralf, could you also tell us if you still need the ocaml-source, and what file you need (and for what packages). Friendly, Sven Luther
