On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 09:23:52AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:10:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Mmm, you did not respond to me about building a libpng2 version of > > camlimage and a libpng3 version of camlimage depending on lablgtk2. > > Sorry I was a bit busy in the last days, I will look at it again today > ...
I have uploaded camlimages 2.11-1 packages which use lablgtk2 and libpng12-0 to apt-source : deb: http://people.debian.org/~luther/ocaml ./ If these seem right to you, you could just upload those, and i can then upload my lablgtk 1.2.5-8 package that close your bug. I believe this is ok to do, because altough lablgtk2 still lacks support for the gnome libraries, it now has again glade and opengl support. I don't know if many people really use the libgnome support in conjunction with camlimages, if there is any doing this, please speak now. Also, in in the lablgtk2 i will upload tomorrow, there will be support for librsvg. BTW, could you add lablgtk2 to the list of packages that get subscribed to debian-ocaml-maint mailing list ? Friendly, Sven Luther
