On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:18:19PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I think i will have a look at the ocaml_packaging_policy document to > > bring it to par with the changes that we have been doing lately. > > > > Also executables package will be separated in 3 groups : > > > > o bytecode only, like ledit. > > > > o native & bytecode versions, like spamoracle. > > > > o native & custom built bytecode versions, like advi. > > > > A bit of explanation about this latest one. It contains C bindings, and > > as thus it doesn't make much sense making it non-custom bytecode, since > > we will have to separate the stublibs into a tiny arch: any package > > anyway. > > > > What would be nice would be if the ocaml runtime could be put in a > > shared library or something for such packages, so that it will not be > > copied for every custom executable. > > > > Also, i will write in the policy the decision we did take about the > > library dependencies, or maybe use the same tactic as with the ocaml > > package. > > My God. Yet another policy madness in order to make maintainers > crazy again. Why don't you want to leave us alone? We don't need > more and more restrictions on the way we package apps. > > You seem to come every month with more annoyance to put in the > policy ....
No, i just want to write down what we already decided. Friendly, Sven Luther
