On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 08:44:50AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > > > > > Is it possible to depends on libpng2-dev for camlimages ? > > > > > > > > I'm discussing the problem both with the upstream maintainer and with > > > > lablgtk maintainer, but we haven't yet managed to reach an agreement on > > > > what to do. > > > > > > > > Moreover I'm really busy actually and last lablgtk upload was an NMU by > > > > Sven Luther, if you have suggestion or similar on this issue please > > > > report it also to the [email protected] mailing list > > > > so that you can reach a wider audience. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the report. > > > > Cheers. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/ > > > > " I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not > > > > sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am CCing the message to debian-ocaml. > > > > > > The libcamlimages-ocaml-dev depends on libpng12-0-dev and should depends > > > on libpng2-dev. I explain myself : > > > Lib | Depends > > > libcamlimages-ocaml-dev | libpng12-0-dev > > > libgtkxmhtml-dev | libpng2-dev > > > liblablgtk-dev | libgtkxmhtml-dev > > > > > > libpng12-0-dev conflicts with libpng2-dev > > > > No, camlimages was built with and for lablgtk2. If you want a libpng2 > > camlimages, then we need a second package built for lablgtk. I asked > > here, and nobody seemed interested by such a thing, and i think it is > > not worth the effort. > > > > That is only because i don't use camlimages at this time :->
A, ok, ... > > > So i cannot install lablgtk if i want to install libcamlimages. > > > > > > Furthermore, libcamlimages builds his gtk extension against lablgtk2. > > > > Yes, ... > > > > > So i have problem to build a lablgtk application with images support. > > > > Which app is this ? > > > Well in fact, it is an app of mine. I need it to load thumbnail... But > maybe other people who are developping app with ocaml will also need it. > > But in fact, there is no problem. In fact, i think i will build in the > near future an app for lablgtk2. It seems a lot more powerful. Well, the decision taken at that time was to keep it as is, as a nagging for peopl to port to lablgtk2. > Concerning this : do you know if someone is planning to adapt zoggy to > lablgtk2 ? Read the mail archive, Maxence told us he would begin working on it once a stable API version of lablgtk2 is released. I think it will happen nextly. BTW, there is a new upstream lablgtk2 available, but i am not packaging it due to the mini-freeze, and because it does change the API a bit. I prefer to wait either for the end of the mini-freeze, or for the stable-API beta release. BTW2, There is not much intention to do gnome bindings. Are some of you using those, or need them ? If yes, maybe a post to Jacques about it would be a good idea. > > So i suppose there is call for a camlimages1 package after all. > > > > I am not sure. I think it could be a good think since there is a > lablgtk1 package. But i am not sure of the interest of the effort. Like said, it would be trivial to do, we just need to have to wait for the ftp-master to accept it though. But as said, lets not do it, and encourage people to port to lablgtk2. Friendly, Sven Luther
