On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:53:22AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > IMO we should fallback on >=/<< dependencies for build-dependencies and > > keep on using virtual names for dependencies. > But what about using only the >= dependencies and dropping the << ones ?
[ I'm assuming that your question is related to build-dependencies ] Uhm ... well yes, we can drop the << and avoid some auto builders delay, but we still have to reupload a new package each time we like it to be rebuilt against a new library bumping the >= dependency ... IMO we can go for it, Jerome?, someone else? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/ " I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney
pgpfluDlGb3hb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
