On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 04:04:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 03:40:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Regarding /usr/include/caml, the latest version of camlidl that > > > installed stuff directly in /usr/include/caml was 1.02-9 (latest is > > > 1.04-4). Since I no other package instull stuff in /usr/include/caml I > > > think you can conflicts with camlidl << 1.04 and you should have no > > > remaining stuff in /usr/include/caml ... > > Ah, so that is where these come from. > > Sure, I told it to you a few weeks ago on this ML :-)
You should have filled a bug report or something, i think my memory is slipping, ... > > I will add the conflict then. What about simply removing the dir if it > > exist, or maybe i should really add the debconf question in case it is > > not a symlink. > > No need, if really camlidl is the only other package installing stuff in > /usr/include/caml (and I'm almost sure this is the case), the conflict > should be enough to avoid remaining stuff in that directory. Mmm, can't find anything else, apart from ocaml and camlidl in stable, not /usr/include/caml in either testing or unstable. This does take in account broken third-party installs, which may have landed there trough the /usr/lib/ocaml/caml symlink in the past. I realize now that this was a bad move back then to change the directory. Good news on another fron though, Maxence fixed the whatis bug in cvs, i only need to pilfer the patch :))) Friendly, Sven Luther
