Your message dated Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:07:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#197969: camlidl should build-depend on dpatch >= 1.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2003 19:41:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 18 14:41:08 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay-1v.club-internet.fr [194.158.96.112]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Sins-0001t6-00; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:41:08 -0500
Received: from localhost (f16v-3-101.d1.club-internet.fr [212.195.202.101])
by relay-1v.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7F7187B5; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:41:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rt by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19Sinm-0001Ew-00; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:41:02 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: camlidl should build-depend on dpatch >= 1.11
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:41:01 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: camlidl
Version: 1.04-4
Severity: normal
According to the dpatch README:
Build-Depend on dpatch. If you use the architecture specific 00list
files (see below) the Build-Depends needs to be versioned for dpatch
(>= 1.11).
-Ralf.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux seneca 2.4.20 #4 Son Jan 26 20:46:23 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages camlidl depends on:
ii ocaml [ocaml-3.06-1] 3.06-17 ML language implementation with a
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 197969-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2003 07:08:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 19 02:08:01 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay-3m.club-internet.fr [194.158.104.42]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19StWY-0005R0-00; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 02:07:58 -0500
Received: from localhost (f16v-3-101.d1.club-internet.fr [212.195.202.101])
by relay-3m.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7884FE062; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:07:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rt by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19StWW-0002lD-00; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:07:56 +0200
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:07:56 +0200
From: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#197969: camlidl should build-depend on dpatch >= 1.11
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-19.8 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 08:44:55AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:41:01PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > According to the dpatch README:
> >
> > Build-Depend on dpatch. If you use the architecture specific 00list
> > files (see below) the Build-Depends needs to be versioned for dpatch
> > (>= 1.11).
>
> I haven't used the architecture specifice 00list files that are IMO the
> ones of the form 00list.$ARCH. I've just used a 00list which, if I have
> understood correctly, is _not_ architecture specific.
>
> Can I close the bug?
Yes, i think I have simpy misread the sentence in he READEME (in the
sense the 00list file is always architecture specific). -Ralf.
--
