Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> We used to discuss this a lot in the past. > > Sure, but we were discussing in the empty, now there is a working > implementation, which we could test, build a few libraries for, get a > feeling for it, and then weigth the pros and cons, not just speak in the > air about philosophical reasons.
This is not philosophy. I'm waiting for you to explain how to handle dependencies and to avoid 2 packages built against different ocaml to depend upon each other, and so on. >> There isn't any problem with it. Older versions are ship with >> stable Debian releases. Unstable and testing don't count. > > You have to be able to look at the future, and see when sarge is > released and maybe even the version thereafter, and ocaml is 3.10. AFAIK, we support nothing but stable. We aren't release managers? >> This is what I did so far, but I've never been convinced. > > Yes, i know, but when did you get the feeling that i was going to force > this on you ? Or maybe my evil twin is in Paris and has been trying to > force you to change your mind ? Force me? You are free to modify your packages without anyone consents AFAIK. You are free to listen or not. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
