Selon Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > o the objinfo patch. May well be included in the next (3.08?) release > > though. > > What do tuo mean with "objinfo patch"? If you mean the patch that change > the executable name it's ok to wait for it. But if you mean the patch > that add support for native code objects (.cmx, .cmxa) why not ship it > already from 3.07?
Like Stefano, I'd be pleased to be educated about this objinfo patch and what it does. > > o the libdir_version patch. May be included in 3.08 also, maybe > > together with the -suffix patch which is not included here. In another > > form though. > > Does this mean that ocaml libraries will be installed back again in > /usr/lib/ocaml instead of /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07? Can we have some details about this too? > It's ok not to support more than one version at a time, but we had > already adopted the /usr/lib/ocaml/<version> convention. IMO is silly to > switch back to /usr/lib/ocaml again. It will be just an additional > difficulty for the users. I doubt it. The switch to the versioned ocaml directory has been done transparently and only packages install stuff there. But maybe did I miss something? Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant
