On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 04:27:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 04:09:28PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > > > * Package name : extlib > > I could have bet someone would package this :-) > > Indeed I was tempted to put some :-P at the end of the mail for the > debian ocaml community :))) > > > > Version : 1.0b > > You should try to use another version, like 0.99b > > otherwise you'll mess version numbers. > > Yes, good suggestion. > > > Since this lib provides utf-8 support, is Camomile worth packaging? > > (it is a big bloat) > > I need to investigate a bit mode, maybe with Sylvain too because the > camomile author is still in the extlib project. Is thus possible that > they have already discussed about the interconnections of the two > packages, don't know yet. > > Cheers. >
Re hello, I just see the two ocamldoc page and i think camomile still worth the value to be packaged : http://camomile.sourceforge.net/dochtml/index.html http://ocaml-lib.sourceforge.net/doc/UTF8.html http://ocaml-lib.sourceforge.net/doc/UChar.html I think there is a lot more in camomile than in extlib. The main question is : "Is it worth to have two different representation ( maybe incompatible ) of UTF-XX character ?". As far as i can see, in camomile, there is module UTF8 UTF16 UCS4, regular expression... I think i will join the extlib ML in order to know more about it ! Regard Sylvain LE GALL
