Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > Err, no, we must not allow ocaml 3.07 to enter testing if it violates > > policy. Either we get a new license from HP or we repackage ocaml. > > Debian policy is not secondary. > > Actually ocaml 3.06 have exactly the same problem (cfr > otherlibs/num/README) and it's not only in testing, but also in > _stable_! > > So I can't see the point in blocking ocaml 3.07 entering testing for > _this_ particular reason.
What a _poor_ reason! > If we wont be able to fix the license problem, the ocaml package (no > matter which version) should be _removed_ from the archive, no matter > which version. So why inhibit 3.07 enter testing? We can modify the source. -- Jérôme Marant
