On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:41:16PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I've a FTBFS for gmetadom on hppa. It's probably an autotools related > issue I'm investigating with upstream, we probably found the problem, > but I'm waiting for a suitable chroot on paer (I've sent a mail to > debian-hppa, still no answer) to debug the problem.
You should contact debian-admin. > Once I've solved the problem should I upload with urgency=high? Yes, please. > Is it permitted or is just an abuse to make packages enter testing > quickly? I never found any mention on the urgency to use, but seriously, you will just apply a relatively minor autotool patch, which will in no way change the compiled files of gmetadom, and should thus be exactly similar to the version currently sitting for 9 days in unstable. So i doubt it will introduce new bugs other than the ones which you will catch anyway by failed autobuilders. I am hesitating about uploading fixed lablgl,lablgtk and lablgtk2 packages with urgency high. I think i will wait for after the mini-freeze. For information, it only changes the debian/rules to install in /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07 instead of /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07+2, fixed version are already checked in in SVN, in case somebody needs to rebuild them. Friendly, Sven Luther
