On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:27:27AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Hi all, > it has been a while that I'm noticing delays in post sent to this list > of about 15 minutes. > > I've looked at the headers of some posts of a recent thread that was > both on this list and on debian-devel. Indeed messages sent to d-o-m > arrived from 15 to 20 minutes later than on debian-devel. > > The delay seems to be added by murphy.debian.org in a rather > deterministic way. As an example look at the message sent by me (sorry, > no net while writing this mail so I can't give you debian archive links) > with this Message-ID: > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The one arrived on d-d have this pair of successive Received headers: > > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP > id A518E1F444; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:44:35 -0500 (CDT) > ^^^^^^^^ > Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from sockmel.bononia.it (sockmel.bononia.it [193.201.40.5]) > by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP > id 03E5F1F407; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:44:31 -0500 (CDT) > > the one arrived on d-o-m: > > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP > id 3D9541F6F0; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 04:00:45 -0500 (CDT) > ^^^^^^^^ > Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from sockmel.bononia.it (sockmel.bononia.it [193.201.40.5]) > by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP > id 03E5F1F407; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:44:31 -0500 (CDT) > > Same for Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> by Wouter > Verhelst and apparently all other posts of that thread.
Mmm, i think the mailing lists are processed in alphabetical order or somethign suh. > Sven I sent this mail here just for the records. Sven can you get in > touch with the mailing list guys on IRC? Otherwise I will forward this > mail to the responsibles (after discovering who they are :-) ... I will try but promise nothing. there is a mailing list manager alias, but i forget the exact name of it. That said, i just suppose this is the way things are, and that you will not reach much, which is way mailing to both the list and the recipient is not such a bad thing. Friendly, Sven Luther
