On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:49:31PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Ok, you sort of convinced me. I would like the opinion of the other > ocaml maintainers before i do that, in case there is something i may > miss that they do not. > > That said, i could make a ocaml-interpreter package, which would be > provided, replaced and conflicted by the ocaml package. What do you > think of that ?
I'm not an ocaml maintainer, but I think it's an excellent idea. Anything which could help adoption of OCaml benefits me & my company. Rich. -- Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://freshmeat.net/users/rwmj Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - all your business data are belong to you. 'There is a joke about American engineers and French engineers. The American team brings a prototype to the French team. The French team's response is: "Well, it works fine in practice; but how will it hold up in theory?"'
