On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 12:15:53PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:23:00AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:47:55PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > > > Hello again all, > > > > > > Well, since i am in a good mood ( ;-) ), i would like to do a full round > > > of package injection in the svn. > > > > > > What i will do : > > > - inject the .orig.tar.gz > > > - inject the debian > > > - tags the current trunk to the version ( for example cameleon will get > > > a 1.3-2 tags ) > > > - add a watch file > > > - add a changelog entry +1 ( 1.3-2 -> 1.3-3 ) > > > - set maintainer to Debian Ocaml Task Force > > > - set uploaders to all of the subscribe members of Debian Ocaml Task > > > Force > > > - add a changelog entry > > > - commit > > > > All, fine with me, but on my remaining packages, i would prefer to stay > > maintainer. These are lablgl, lablgtk, lablgtk2, mlgtk, camlzip and > > spamoracle. > > > > I guess that all except camlzip and spamoracle are already in > > subversion, there is no watch thingy. > > > > BTW, lablgtk subversion contains lablgtk2, and lablgtk1 is a subdir of it. > > > > Friendly, > > > > Sven Luther > > > > > > Hello, > > You will like to have camlzip and spamoracle in subversion ? > > If so, should i take the latest debian package ?
Yep. altough i could also do it myself. Please go ahead, the latest version is the debian package. Mmm, mlgtk is also not in subversion, but there i preconize another approach, putting the whole source tree in subversion, since upstream is mostly dead anyway, and mlgtk in debian is the latest version. Friendly, Sven Luther
