On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 07:56:13PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 06:38:39PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Ok, i will make the changes to lablgl, lablgtk and lablgtk2. Should i > > wait for findlib to having been built on all arches, and do we need to > > add a findlib (>= 1.0.2) dependency and/or build-dependency ? > > Good question (formula used each time one doesn't know how to answer). > > No need to build-depends on it, METAs are just copied at the end of the > build process. For the depend: technically the library shipped with > those META doesn't needs findlib, _but_ those new file wont work (I > guess) with older findlibs. So is probably better to depend on findlib > greater than 1.0.2 indeed.
Or a build-depend for those package which use findlib for building. Does something such exist ? > This will imply that lablg* packages wont be installable until findlib > gets built, which is in turn stucked by ocaml-nums in the NEW queue. Nope, ocaml-nums escaped the NEW queue this week, no problem then. > I've uploaded powerpc package, I can also upload an i386 package just to > miminiza users' trouble ... What do you think of this proposal? Let's wait a few days so most auto-builders catch on, and then i will upload fixed packages. Friendly, Sven Luther
