On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:32:16PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > "Sylvain LE GALL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hello, > > > > Well there is quite a bit of activity on svn. Well, i think it should be > > good to have a clear policy on tagging files for upload. > > > >>From recent upload, i think we should follow this step : > > - build and upload the package > > - wait for the official accept of this package in the queue ( ie a > > message saying that all files are present ) > > - tagging the uploaded version : > > svn copy .../packages/XXX/trunk .../packages/XXX/tags/YYY > > where XXX is the package and YYY the version that has been accepted. > > > > It introduce the problem, of not being able to commit during the wait > > for the official notice... But it is only a matter of 1 or 2 days, i > > think. > > > > Have you any comments on this ? > > Looks OK. >
OK. > BTW, I'd like to add one comment: I think commiting the upstream > tarball in the SVN repo is silly. I know, I've already said so > in the past and I still stand, because it doesn't add any historical > benefit to the repository (every tarball has a different name). > > So, I'd propose that we move those tarballs to a dedicated > download location: alioth provides an Anonymous FTP location > which could be use for that purpose. We could also use > the space dedicated to the web stuff. > Humm... I prefer to keep it this way : as a personnal matter of fact, i like to keep things, which are tight, together... Ie debian/ is nothing without tarball, tarball is nothing to Debian without debian/... It is only a personnal taste. Kind regard Sylvain LE GALL
