On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 09:57:14AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 03:48:42PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Joeyh, would it be ok to add a ocaml task there, in addition to the > > C/C++, Perl, Java and i don't remember what else it was. I know the > > ocaml task was rejected for the woody release, but back then i was told > > it would be ok for sarge. > > > > (CCing to the debian-ocaml-maint mailing list). > > Have you got any answer?
Not yet. > If not, what about asking the same on debian-devel or similar? I think > we really deserver an ocaml task and I don't want to miss it just > because someone is unresponsive ... You did work on this the last time ? And you maintain or co-maintain the meta packages right now. What about we prepare a working taks for tasksel, i test it in a personal d-i build or something, and then we fill a buglist report against tasksel, and i follow the discussion with the people making the decision. After all, there is currently a java task, and there is not even a free mainstream java compiler in debian, altough it seems kaffe, gcj and co are getting there quickly. Friendly, Sven Luther
