[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) writes: >> I think that free programs shall not refer to non-free ones. > > Not sure if you make a distinction between programs and documentation, > but Sven listed books.
Nitpicking. Replace programs with packages and you get the idea. >> IMO, it looks like a dependency on non-free programs even if >> there is no such info in Depends/Recommends/Whatever. > > Until the Social Contract gets amended, your feeling does not > reflect Debian opinion. It is not about my feeling: those packages come from the non-free section. > Anyway non-free software seems not to be included in tasks. IMO > it does still make sense to list these books, derived distros > may include non-free software if they want. Derived distro will probably customize tasks w.r.t. their needs. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
