On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 11:24:39PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:27:16PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > The numerix package has two (!) RC bugs open since 38 days (!), not > > to speak of an important bug open since 33 days (which in > > fact should be merged with 230944. Is anyone taking care of > > this? I thought we are all trying to get rid of RC bugs for > > the release. Who is sponsoring this package? Is there some > > major problem to fix these bugs, or is it just lazyness? > > Otherwise I can try to fix it this weekend. > > I had sponsored the package, and had a quick look. > > Basically, the major problem is that numeric doesn't support clear > byte/native code separation, if i remember well. Sylvain said he would > have a look, and medwards said he had a solution to it, but never got > around to make the new upload (and seemed to have disspeared these past > two weeks or so, but is back again since a few days, it seems). > > I had not really the time to fix the bug though. > > Notice that this bug is not sarge critical, since numerix was never yet > in sarge. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther >
Hello, I have intention to fix the bug, but last time i heard of Michael, he said he has a fix... So i don't want to double the work, and let him do the fix. Maybe we should ping him in order to know what his is position. Regard Sylvain Le Gall ps : if you feel like having time to close RC bugs, could you upload ocamldap ( the one commited in svn ), it has one RC bug, thanks in advance.
