Hello, On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 08:11:24AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:54:10PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have added some watch file for different packages : > > - bibtex2html > > > So, i am just asking if i am permitted to add it to the svn ? > > Please don't add it for bibtex2html. The problem is that JCF > insists on a numbering scheme which goes like > 1.58, 1.59, 1.6, 1.61, ... which doesn't correspond to the > natural ordering relation. So a watch file would give (in some > cases) wrong results, unless it is possible to implement a > translation of upstream version numbers. Is this possible in > a watch file? Like translating "\d\.\d" to "\d\.\d0" ? >
That's strange, here is the output of uscan : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/deb/ocaml-package/bibtex2html$ uscan --report --verbose -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In ./debian/watch, processing watchfile line: http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr/ftp/bibtex2html/bibtex2html-([0-9\.]*)\.tar\.gz -- Found the following matching hrefs: bibtex2html-1.52.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.53.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.54.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.55.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.56.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.57.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.58.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.59.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.60.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.61.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.62.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.63.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.64.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.65.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.66.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.67.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.68.tar.gz bibtex2html-1.69.tar.gz Newest version on remote site is 1.69, local version is 1.66 => Newer version available -- Scan finished So it seems to follow a classical versioning scheme. Maybe i am wrong ? Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall ps : forgive me, i don't have update this dir since a long time
