On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 04:09:54PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: > On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 15:59, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > > Well, what about : > > libcompilers-extra-ocaml in place of libbase-extra-ocaml. > That sounds better. > > > For the split graphics/labltk, we could include graphics in > > liblabltk-ocaml, but we need to state this in short/long description... > > > > If you could include it in your patch, i will be very thankfull to you. > Well, I don't have time to change it tonight, but if people really like > these names better, I can change them(or anyone else can for that > matter). I don't think the names are that big of a deal, so I'll be > happy to do whatever you guys prefer. >
Hello, I see your post concerning test of the split... Do you intend to keep it this way or can you change your mind ? Anyway, i will test your package, naming issue should not prevent you to do what you think is good. I thik libcompilers-extra-ocaml is a good name, concerning graphics/labltk, i still have no great idea for a name... Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall
