Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Salut, > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > >> The work of splitting the emacs stuff in a separate package >> is almost done. Few questions though: >> >> 1/ it is called caml-mode in sources since it applies to caml light >> as well. Shall I keep calling it caml-mode or ocaml-mode? > > I prefer to keep the upstream name caml-mode.
OK, so noone agrees :-P. However, Jacques Garrigue used to ship it as ocaml-mode, see: http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/soft/olabl/ocaml.html >> 2/ this new package depends on ocaml-nox, and ocaml-nox needs to >> depend on it until etch is released (for transitional purpose), >> which makes a circular dependency. Is this a problem? > > Maybe it is not necesarry to have ocaml-nox depend on caml-mode. > It should be sufficient to state in the NEWS.Debian that the > mode has been split off into a separate package. Not having > caml-mode installed doesn't stop ocaml from working. OK. > On the other hand why the dependency of caml-mode on ocaml-nox? If it > is only because caml-mode may call the ocaml compiler then a recommends > seems sufficient, as it is the case with tuareg-mode. OK. > If you put the mods into svn before upload I can have a look at > it. I'll commit soon. -- Jérôme Marant
