Remi Vanicat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2005/9/3, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Hi, >> >> gcc and al are standard packages. Is this really relevant? >> >> Cheers, > > gcc is not an essential package, only a build essential one. So yes, > to be policy compliant, we should depend on it. > We don't want one of our user to failed to compile one of his program > because he have no gcc installed, and do only ocaml > > On the other side, I believe that one could compile a program with > ocamlc without it (at least, when you use no C library). But I still > believe we should depend on it.
Right. I agree we should add dependencies on gcc and binutils for ocaml-nox and ocaml-native-compilers. Shall I go for it? -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
