On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:10:59AM +1000, skaller wrote: > Recalling some previous discussion on Debian and AMD64, > Sven had low opinion of my ISP because AMD64 Debian packages > were not mirrored .. well I asked them to do so, and now they have! > > Looking in > > 'ftp://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian-amd64/debian-amd64/dists/' > > I can see this: [No, the mirror is not publically available] > > Directory:etch 15/09/05 14:35:00 > Directory:etch-proposed-updates 15/09/05 14:35:00 > Directory:experimental 15/09/05 15:00:00 > Directory:proposed-updates 15/09/05 14:39:00 > Directory:sarge 15/09/05 14:35:00 > Directory:sarge-proposed-updates 15/09/05 14:39:00 > Directory:sarge-unsupported 15/09/05 14:42:00 > Directory:sid 15/09/05 14:39:00 > Directory:stable 15/09/05 14:35:00 > Directory:stable-proposed-updates 15/09/05 14:39:00 > Directory:stinkypete 15/09/05 14:42:00 > Directory:testing 15/09/05 14:35:00 > Directory:testing-proposed-updates 15/09/05 14:35:00 > Directory:unstable 15/09/05 14:39:00 > > I have two questions: which section should I use > to get at the latest Ocaml Debian packages on an > Ubuntu Hoary system? > > And, I have a spare 200G disk on which I am thinking > to build a complete new Debian system, at least a chroot > partition (although bootable would be interesting if I can > figure out what to do with stuff like mail .. :) > > Same question: given I want the latest and best Ocaml packages, > and am willing to take some risks (since faults will not stop > my Ubuntu desktop operating) which sections should I use > in my apt/sources.list?
unstable then. Friendly, Sven LUther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
