On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 15:45:04 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Well the question is the following : > > 1) is the version in sarge ok, and is it even in sarge ? > > 2) is the version in etch/testing ok ? > > 3) if not, do you think our users can live with temporarily a broken cduce > on these architectures ? > > Notice that gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 seems to be broken right now, at least for > kernels. > > I personally feel that we should go for 3), forget about those bugs for now, > and fix them for the upcoming 3.09.0 packages, which you may start building > using the ocaml in experimental. > I don't know about the ARM and IA64 problems, but I built ocaml from CVS HEAD a few days ago on alpha, and ocamlopt.opt was still completely broken, so I don't think 3.09 will have fixed it. Another problem is that ocaml 3.08.3-8 on alpha is missing a lot of cmx files, but this dodn't cause a build failure, so the broken package migrated to testing before anyone noticed. I guess we either need to find out what the problem is, or stop building ocamlopt on alpha. We could probably ask the toolchain or alpha people for help, although I dont know if any of them is familiar with ocaml :/
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
