> Well, I'm hoping that the necessary patches will go into upstream > which makes the point moot. However, I don't understand your point > that having libcamlrun.so is somehow more "messy" than having > libcamlrun.a. In both cases there will be programs depending on the > exact same API. libcamlrun is the bytecode interpreter, and is fully > documented in the official manual. It's not some sort of "internals".
My sincere apologies. I misunderstood the problem at first glance. After reading the bug report, it's definitely going to be useful (I just switched to AMD64 myself). Thanks. -- Jérôme Marant
