Ralf Treinen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:55:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:45:03PM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:19:01PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:19:12PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:Unless someone objects to it, I'll package and upload OCaml 3.09.1 as soon as 3.09.0 is in testing. Do you all agree with a full rebuild?Yes, but let's do it like this : 1) we wait until ocaml 3.09.1 is built and installed on all autobuilders. 2) we compose a list of all ocaml related packages. 3) we ask Steve to requeue all those ocaml related packages for a binNMU, and file RC bugs against all those that fail.But we still have to do a source upload for those packages which Depend on ocaml-*-3.09.0, I guess. I'm thinking of packages that are architecture=all, and compiled to byte-code.The packages in the SVN repository that have rules to generate debian/control based on the OCaml API version will need to have a newly-generated debian/control committed first, and then uploaded, right? So it's not just a binNMU, unless I'm missing something.Well, only the build-depend was generated, the rest is provided by dh_gencontrol, and as we used (ocaml >= 3.09.0) for build dependencies, this should work without problem, provided we guarantee that there is no older ocaml 3.09.0 on the autobuilders.Did I miss something? Since when does dh_gencontrol detect the dependency of ocaml-bytecode on the right version of the ocaml interpreter?
We are now doing something like
Depends: ocaml-base-nox-${F:OCamlABI}
in control and
OCAMLABI := $(shell ocamlc -version)
dh_gencontrol -- -VF:OCamlABI="$(OCAMLABI)"
in rules.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
