On Wed, Jan 4, 2006 at 20:19:12 +0000, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Unless someone objects to it, I'll package and upload OCaml 3.09.1 as > > soon as 3.09.0 is in testing. Do you all agree with a full rebuild? > > Yes, but let's do it like this : > > 1) we wait until ocaml 3.09.1 is built and installed on all autobuilders. > > 2) we compose a list of all ocaml related packages. > grep-dctrl -n -FBuild-Depends,Build-Depends-Indep ocaml -sPackage \ /var/lib/apt/lists/*_debian_dists_unstable_main_source_Sources will give you the list.
> 3) we ask Steve to requeue all those ocaml related packages for a binNMU, > and file RC bugs against all those that fail. > The biggest problem won't be the packages which will fail, but those which will build, but make broken debs. I grepped through the packages in svn and found that the following packages are in this case (because they will install files in /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/ or hardcode 3.09.0 in the package, while not build-depending on 3.09.0 specifically): cairo-ocaml calendar equeue facile findlib gmetadom netclient ocaml-vorbis ocamldbi ocamlnet ocamlsdl postgresql-ocaml pxp ulex xstr The following packages will need a source upload as well (because their build-deps won't work with 3.09.1): ara bibtex2html cduce felix hlins hevea mlgmp mysql-ocaml ocaml-getopt ocaml-tools ocamlagrep ocamlcreal ocamlweb otags pagodacf perl4caml planets regexp-pp spamoracle All other lib packages seem to allow for binNMUs for this kind of transition, and there are other packages I didn't look at yet (mostly packages containing an ocaml program, which will need a rebuild if it isn't built with ocamlc -custom on architectures lacking ocamlopt. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
