This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#332902: numerix: FTBFS on hppa: cannot reach 00000040_caml_c_call+0, recompile 
with -ffunction-sections,
which was filed against the binutils package.

It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at 332902-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2006 03:53:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 15 19:53:54 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 83-216-156-21.jamest747.adsl.metronet.co.uk ([83.216.156.21] 
helo=pasta.gloaming.local)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EyLRK-0004uo-Fl
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:53:54 -0800
Received: from james by pasta.gloaming.local with local (Exim 4.52 #1 (Debian))
        id 1EyLQp-0007o9-Nw
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 03:53:23 +0000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: numerix: FTBFS on hppa: cannot reach 00000040_caml_c_call+0, 
recompile with
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 03:53:23 +0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi,

Based on:

  http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2006/01/msg00007.html

And the Debian and upstream bugs linked in it, I'm closing this bug.

-- 
James


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to