Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > If you're using stable/testing you have two choices. The first is to use > backports. Unfortunately they're quite of day right now, since manually > managing them is quite painful. I started working on a tool to ease (by > the mean of automation) backports hoping to not lag behind unstable, but > the development has stopped months ago. Lack of time, as usual. I hope > to work on it again soon. > > The second choice is to keep watching our svn repository and manually > rebuilt packages from them (hand-make backporting basically). It is > fairly easy due to the way we manage ocaml version changes recently. > > You mean one debian-ocaml-maint svn repositorie, don't you? I will try this, then, since I'm using stable. And I also need some other related package, like Omake, that I will manage also manually. Supposing that you finish your tool to automate the backport, where should I have a regular look, in order not to miss it?
> You can use Godi to manage a completely separate installation of ocaml > under /usr/local (and that's easy of course). 0 interaction Godi-Debian > in that case. In theory, it would be even possible to use Godi for > adding packages to a Debian Ocaml setting, I tried to walk this way in > the past starting packaging Godi, but unfortunately I tried it when Godi > was swamped with incompatibility issues with the gcc compiler that we > had in Debian at that time and thus I gave up. The tricky parts of > course would be when you start having a package which is available both > as a Debian and as a Godi package .... I think noone investigated this. > > Do not expect me to try to mix, then ;-) > You see, I gave you a few solutions, I hope at least to have given you > some answers :-) > > Thanks to all of you for your work and your answers. Salutations Matthieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
