* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-18 20:25]: > There is no native ocaml compiler for mips/mipsel, and as thus, there is no > need for mips/mipsel to build the native-code spamoracle package.
So why does the package use ocaml-nox rather than ocaml-native-compilers to compile the native-code package? If ocaml-nox can build this package, shouldn't the native-code spamoracle package. be built on all arches that have ocaml-nox? Or should the build-dependency be ocaml-native-compilers instead? > should be pretty obvious from the description of the spamoracle and > spamoracle-byte packages. As somehow who doesn't know ocaml at all, this is not obvious at all. Looking at the build-dependency suggests only ocaml-nox is needed, and that is available on mips. > > > Automatic build of spamoracle_1.4-7 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.94 > I guess you should just fix the buildds to not try to build packages they have > no business messing with. This is not an official buildd. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
