On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 15:23 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Why did you chose to use advi as an example, and not spamoracle ? The advi > example is only valid if you have c bindings, but even then, they should > probably be moved into a library package instead.
spamoracle builds 2 packages, one with bytecode, one with native. I wanted one package with either native or bytecode depending on the platform, preferring native where available. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
