On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 18:00 +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: > Unfortunately, I found out that ergo is under the CeCILL license
Yes .. > which > is not DFSG-free if I remember well (am I wrong?). Hmmm .. i'm just reading it, and it seems to me to be ok. It does insist that the software remain open source -- if you give it or a derived work to someone you cannot refuse to supply or point at the source: so a distributor cannot extinguish the open-ness. It looks like a French version of GPL to me :) But IANAL .. Preamble: The purpose of this Free Software license agreement is to grant users the right to modify and re-use the software governed by this license. The exercising of this right is conditional upon the obligation to make available to the community the modifications made to the source code of the software so as to contribute to its evolution. Does Debian have specific requirements for particular, recognized licences? -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
