On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:32:38AM +0200, Alain Frisch wrote: > I found some recent discussions in this mailing list (which I'm not > subscribed to, so please Cc: me if you want to reply to this e-mail) > about CDuce and OCamlduce. Some clarifying points:
Hi Alain, thanks for getting in touch with us for this. > - cduce needs the ocaml sources, ocaml-compiler-libs is not enough; the > reason is that cduce will -pack OCaml compiler modules, which requires > some special compilation command-line (-for-pack) for native code. Ok, fair enough, we will re-enable the generation of the ocaml-source package then. While we are at it (and since I'm lazy to check it right now :)), does CDuce need a fresh untarred tarball of the OCaml sources or any other particular stage of the OCaml sources (e.g. after building the compiler)? > - ocamlduce is a stand-alone package, which requires only a working > OCaml installation. It is distributed as a modified version of OCaml, > *not* as a patch. ocamlduce hasn't been ported to 3.10, though. Ok. > - I've clarified the licensing issues about ocamlduce: the license is > the same as for OCaml (QPL/LGPL + exceptions). Cf: > http://sympa.cduce.org/wws/arc/ocamlduce/2007-04/msg00007.html Ok, thanks, great! Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
