On 14-06-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I worked another bit on 3.10.0 packages, the main changes can be > summarized as follows: > - re-enabled building of the ocaml-source package (but with a new > methods, which is hopefully more maintainable in the future) > - ported patches to the stable 3.10.0 tarball > > An upload of ocaml 3.10.0-1 to experimental has been done yesterday. > > Open issues (i.e. request for comments from other debian camlers): > > - the ocaml-nox .deb is now about 30 Mb and installs something like 9 Mb > of camlp4 related executables (sizes on i386 arch). Shall we split out > an ocaml-camlp4-extras with the various kind of camlp4 executables? >
OK > - the ocaml-source package now contains ocaml sources *after* debian > specific patches have been applied. Is that what we want? (My answer > is yes, but one can argue that a vanilla source tarball is desirable) > Better than before. > - ocamlbuild is installed upstream as ocamlbuild.byte / > ocamlbuild.native / ocamlbuild (the latter being a *copy* of the best > executable among the former two). This breaks the convention of foo / > foo.opt of other legacy ocaml tools. I thus renamed ocamlbuild so that > the plain version is bytecode (and is in ocaml-nox) and so that > ocamlbuild.opt is the optimized version (and is in > ocaml-native-compilers). Do you like my choice? > Yes. > - assuming the experimental packages are fine (please test them no > matter the open issues above!) are we ready to upload to unstable? (Of > course pending an approval of the RMs) > Will test it next week > Many thanks for your feedback, > Cheers. I see that you shipped more "internal" lib using a directory structure. Many thanks for this -- i hope it will enable me to build cameleon tools. See you soon Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
