On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:42:12AM +1000, skaller wrote: > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 14:32 +0200, Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > > On 6/16/07, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I like this new solution too. The plain name (the optimized one), could > > > be made an alternative, or even better yet, we could implement > > > the scheme we used to speak about a bit in the past years, where a > > > alternative-like mechanism allowed for system wide selection of either > > > all native binaries, or all bytecode ones, or individual overrides for > > > selected executables. > > Debian has little choice but to make executable with the same > names are Inria provides. Ocamlopt.opt is the native code version > of the native code compiler and that's it.
I agree, we shouldn't deviate from the upstream naming scheme. -Ralf. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
