On 06-07-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting (and rearranging) text from myself: > > ledit (1.13-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > * BIG FAT WARNING: ledit does not build against the new camlp4, we will > need > one of: > 1) packaging camlp4s (http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/) > 2) porting ledit to the new camlp4 > 3) dropping ledit from the archive > > Therefore I'm in favour of (1) (still, I haven't yet looked at binary > name conflicts or similar issues...), what do you think? >
The only choice which is not a good solution is "2)" since, it requires work that is quite complicated to do if upstream doesn't agree. Before talking about 1) and 3), i think we should estimate the amount of conflict in the namespace... IMHO, 1) is good as far as it doesn't imply to change anything in ocaml itself. If packaging camlp4s requires to modify anything in ocaml package, lets go for 3). Regards, Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
